Forty-seven senators from both sides of the aisle have reminded the National Commission on the Future of the Army of the important role played by the reserve components and want commissioners to consider that role as they prepare their report for Congress and the president. Marcus Mariota – Oregon Ducks Jerseys The bipartisan group of senators signed a letter delivered last week to the panel that is investigating how the Army should prepare for future threats. fjallraven kanken mochilas The commission was created by Congress in the wake of a controversial Army plan that would remove AH-64 Apache helicopters from the Guard, but its mandate is much more broad. NIKE AIR ZOOM VOMERO 11
The letter was signed by Sen. TENNIS CLASSIC ULTRA FLYKNIT Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Womens Air Jordan 12 Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the co-chairmen of the Senate National Guard Caucus, along with 45 of their Senate colleagues. asics gel lyte v femme The senators make three points in the letter. Jake Arrieta Authentic Jersey First, they reinforce the notion that the Army Guard is “the most cost-effective way to ensure combat capabilities and capacity for the nation.” Second, they encourage modifying “self-imposed, archaic” policies and funding mechanisms that prevent the Army from making best use of the capabilities in all components. goedkoop nike air max 2016 Also, the lawmakers want the panel to consider domestic response and how it can best be addressed within the Pentagon. Nike Air Max 2017 schoenen “When Congress created the Commission, we sought additional advice from a panel of experts because we recognized the nation’s Army was at a crossroads, and wanted greater analysis before deciding on a path that made irreversible changes,” the senators wrote.